Runometry Index
73/100
No. 4 of 18
Value for money: Good
- Lightness265 g
- +18.5 pts
- Cushioning38 mm
- +24.3 pts
- FoamPEBA
- +30.0 pts
Shoe profile
Measurements
- Weight
- 265 g
- Reference size not stated by the source
- AverageHeavier than 53% of them
- Forefoot stack
- 34 mm
- HighHigher than 65% of them
Construction
- Midsole foam
- ZoomX,SR-02
- Foam material
- PEBA
- Outsole
- thin rubber
Who and what for
- Use
- Marathon
- Category
- Tempo & uptempo shoes
- Versions
- Unisex
What’s new since the Nike Zoom Fly 5
Same line, new version: here’s what moved, from the published values. Weights are only compared in the same size.
| Criterion | Zoom Fly 6 (2024)This version | Zoom Fly 5 (2022) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight | 265 g | 314 g | Sizes differ or aren’t stated: no gap given |
| Drop | 8 mm | 10 mm | −2 mm |
| Midsole foam | ZoomX / SR-02 | ZoomX / SR-02 | Unchanged |
| Plate | Carbon | Carbon | Unchanged |
| Catalogue price | USD 180 | USD 170 | +USD 10 |
Model history
2024 This version
Nike
Zoom Fly 6
- Weight 265 g
- Drop 8 mm
- 6 colours
2022
Nike
Zoom Fly 5
- Weight 314 g
- Drop 10 mm
2021
Nike
Zoom Fly 4
- Weight 263 g
- Drop 11 mm
2019
Nike
Zoom Fly 3
- Weight 274 g
- Drop 11 mm
Similar shoes
Derived from terrain, category, use, cushioning, stability, drop, weight and price. Gaps are given against Nike Zoom Fly 6.
Saucony
Endorphin Speed 5
- Weight 237 g
- Drop 8 mm
- 5 colours
- same terrain · same category · same role
- 6 mm less under the heel
Mizuno
Neo Vista
- Weight 265 g
- Drop 8 mm
- same terrain · same category · same role
- Also made for: Tempo runs
- Weight 265 g
- Drop 6 mm
- same terrain · same category · same role
- 2 mm lower drop
- 4.5 mm less under the heel
- same terrain · same category · same role
- 3.5 mm less under the heel
- Also made for: Tempo runs