1,272 running shoes listed and more than 1K prices compared every day (GB).

Skip to content

Brooks Cascadia 20 Women's

Runometry Index 72 out of 100 · Run off road · Versatile trailTrailTrainingVersatile trailReleased 2026
Brooks Cascadia 20, side view, Blue
WomenBlue

Shoe profile

Runometry Index

72/100

No. 9 of 53 among the current models of its profile

Value for money: Very good

Lightness306 g
+24.7 pts
Cushioning35 mm
+47.6 pts
Foam

Measurements

Compared with the current models of its profile

Weight
306 g
Reference size not stated by the source
AverageHeavier than 60% of them
Drop
6 mm
AverageTypical
Heel stack
38 mm
Very highHigher than 87% of them
Forefoot stack
32 mm
Very highHigher than 90% of them

Construction

Midsole foam
DNA FLASH v2,TrailAdapt
Widths
standard, wide
Outsole
Vibram Megagrip (4mm lugs)
Trail use stated by the brand
All-terrain trails

Who and what for

Versions
Unisex

Sources: brooksrunning.com (manufacturer), slrc.com (retailer), brooksrunning.com (manufacturer)

What’s new since the Brooks Cascadia 19

Same line, new version: here’s what moved, from the published values. Weights are only compared in the same size.

Read the full comparison
CriterionCascadia 20 (2026)This versionCascadia 19 (2025)Change
Weight 306 g 300 g Sizes differ or aren’t stated: no gap given
Drop 6 mm 6 mm Unchanged
Heel stack 38 mm 35 mm +3 mm
Forefoot stack 32 mm 29 mm +3 mm
Midsole foam DNA FLASH v2 / TrailAdapt DNA LOFT v3 New
Catalogue price USD 160 USD 150 +USD 10

Model history

2026 This version

2026

2025

2025

2024

Similar shoes

Derived from terrain, category, use, cushioning, stability, drop, weight and price. Gaps are given against Brooks Cascadia 20.

    • same terrain · same category · same role
    • 8 mm less under the heel

    • same terrain · same category · same role
    • 8 mm less under the heel

    • same terrain · same category · same role
    • 4 mm less under the heel

    • same terrain · same category · same role

Report an error