Black Friday: deals from 2 shops, compared for you.

Skip to content

Scott Foil RC Tri vs Sunn Gp Finest

Scott Foil RC Tri, side view

Scott

Foil RC Tri

Sunn Gp Finest, side view

Sunn

Gp Finest

Top of the rangeAeroCarbon700c2026
Top of the rangeAeroCarbon700c2026

Close on the specs and the list price: here are their 11 differences, line by line.

At a glance

  • Sunn Gp Finest is 500 g lighter than Scott Foil RC Tri (brand figures).
Key specs5 differences
Model yearSame for all 2026 2026
Weight 8 kg °Value not published by the brand 7.5 kg Best of the comparison−500 g
FrameSame for all Carbon
As printed

Material: Carbon

Carbon
As printed

FULL CARBON HM FRAME

Wheelset 700c · 404 S — ZIPP 404 S Carbon Tubeless °Value not published by the brand 700c · DT Swiss ARC 1400 Dicut 50
DrivetrainSame for all 2×12 2×12
Groupset SRAM RED AXS, Force °Value not published by the brand SRAM Force AXS E1
As printed

SRAM FORCE AXS E1 12S AR / SRAM FORCE AXS E1

Brake model SRAM eTap AXS Wireless Blips °Value not published by the brand SRAM Force AXS E1 Centerlock Paceline 160/140
Seatpost Syncros Duncan SL Aero TRI BRUTE AERO CARBON SEATPOST 0 OFFSET

Prices

Each model's retailers, delivered to your country, and their prices over time.

Scott Foil RC Tri

Scott Foil RC Tri

Sunn Gp Finest

Sunn Gp Finest

Affiliate links: no extra cost for you ♥

Character

The bike at a glance: the ground it is made for, how it handles, its gears and its equipment, beside the other bikes of its kind.

  • Foil RC Tri · Road bike all-round, very stable, average gearing, very high equipment.
  • Gp Finest · Road bike all-round, rather nimble, very high equipment.
Terrain
Scott Foil RC Tri 54%Sunn Gp Finest 40%1 bike3 bikes3 bikes5 bikes2 bikes3 bikes · Sunn Gp Finest1 bike6 bikes · Scott Foil RC Tri2 bikes3 bikes9 bikes
EasyDemanding
Handling
Scott Foil RC Tri 86%Sunn Gp Finest 23%1 bike3 bikes1 bike1 bike1 bike1 bike1 bike3 bikes · Sunn Gp Finest6 bikes1 bike2 bikes1 bike3 bikes7 bikes2 bikes7 bikes · Scott Foil RC Tri1 bike2 bikes
NimbleStable

Gearing

Speed in the lowest and the highest gear at 90 rpm: lower on the left climbs easier, higher on the right goes faster.

  • Scott Foil RC Tri12 km/h - 55 km/h
Easiest gear (climbing)Hardest gear (descending)
Scott Foil RC TriSunn Gp Finestother aero road bikes

Components and specs

Every spec line by line; the higher range of a component is marked. The technical groups are folded.

Ride type
Ride typeSame for all Aero °Value not published by the brand Aero
As printed

Route Aero

Frame and fork1 difference
ForkSame for all Carbon °Value not published by the brand Carbon
As printed

FULL CARBON HM 12X100MM THRU-AXLE FLAT-MOUNT DISC

Max tyre clearance–Not given 32 mm
Axles–Not given Thru-axles
As printed

12X142MM THRU-AXLE

Bottom bracket SRAM DUB PF ROAD 86.5 °Value not published by the brand PF 86,5 road
Cable routingSame for all Internal °Value not published by the brand
As printed

internal cable routing

Internal
As printed

INTERNAL CABLE ROUTING

Drivetrain3 differences
Groupset brandSame for all SRAM °Value not published by the brand SRAM
As printed

SRAM FORCE AXS E1 12S

ShiftingSame for all Electronic, wireless °Value not published by the brand
As printed

SRAM FORCE AXS 24-Speed, Electronic Shift System SRAM eTap AXS Wireless Blips

Electronic, wireless
ChainringsSame for all 2 °Value not published by the brand 2
Gears at the backSame for all 12 °Value not published by the brand 12
Chainring teeth SRAM FORCE Powermeter 48-35T °Value not published by the brand SRAM Force AXS Powermeter 48x35 Higher range
Cassette SRAM FORCE XG1270, 10-33T °Value not published by the brand SRAM Force XG-1270 10-36
Rear derailleur SRAM FORCE AXS 24-Speed, Electronic Shift System °Value not published by the brand SRAM FORCE AXS E1 12S AR SRAM FORCE AXS E1 AV °Value not published by the brand
Shifters SRAM eTap AXS Wireless Blips °Value not published by the brand–Not given
Power meter fittedSame for all yes °Value not published by the brand yes
Brakes
BrakesSame for all Hydraulic disc °Value not published by the brand
As printed

SRAM Disque hydraulique

Hydraulic disc °Value not published by the brand
As printed

SRAM Force Disque hydraulique

Front rotor 160 mm °Value not published by the brand–Not given
Rear rotor 140 mm °Value not published by the brand–Not given
Wheels and tyres2 differences
Wheel sizeSame for all 700c / 29" °Value not published by the brand 700c / 29" °Value not published by the brand
RimsSame for all Carbon °Value not published by the brand Carbon °Value not published by the brand
Rim depth–Not given 50 mm
Tubeless readySame for all yes °Value not published by the brand yes
Tyres Schwalbe PRO ONE Aero, TL-Easy, Fold, 700x28C °Value not published by the brand Michelin Powercup Competition Line TLR 30 mm
Tyre width fitted 28 mm °Value not published by the brand 30 mm +2 mm
Cockpit and seatpost1 difference
Handlebar ZIPP VUKA Bull, VUKA clip with carbon EVO extensions °Value not published by the brand–Not given
Stem Syncros Foil 1.5 Aero °Value not published by the brand–Not given
Seatpost model Syncros Duncan SL Aero TRI °Value not published by the brand BRUTE AERO CARBON SEATPOST 0 OFFSET °Value not published by the brand
Integrated cockpit–Not given yes

° Value not published by the brand

Geometry

A size per bike (the nearest to the first one's at first), the differences measured from the reference bike.

Foil RC Tri · MGp Finest · M
  • Foil RC Tri · M
  • Gp Finest · M

Stack and reach

510520530540550560570580350360370380390400410420↖ UprightAggressive ↘Reach (mm)Stack (mm)Foil RC Tri · M — Reach (mm) 389 · Stack (mm) 548Gp Finest · M — Reach (mm) 384 · Stack (mm) 544
  • Foil RC Tri · M Foil RC Tri · M — Reach (mm) 389 · Stack (mm) 548
  • Gp Finest · M Gp Finest · M — Reach (mm) 384 · Stack (mm) 544
Geometry14 differences
SizeSame for all M M
Reach 389 mm 384 mm −5 mm
Stack 548 mm 544 mm −4 mm
Top tube (effective) 550 mm 540 mm −10 mm
Seat tube 523 mm 504 mm −19 mm
Head tube 141 mm 131 mm −10 mm
Head angle 72.5° 73.3° +0.8°
Seat angle 73.6° 74° +0.4°
Chainstays 412 mm 410 mm −2 mm
Wheelbase 993 mm 984 mm −9 mm
Front centre 591 mm 585 mm −6 mm
Standover 801 mm –Not given
BB drop 70 mm 74 mm +4 mm
BB height 275 mm 262 mm −13 mm
Fork offset 45 mm 53 mm +8 mm
Trail 59 mm 47 mm −12 mm
Stem 110 mm –Not given

Where to buy them

Frequently asked questions

Which is lighter, Scott Foil RC Tri or Sunn Gp Finest?

Sunn Gp Finest weighs 7.5 kg, Scott Foil RC Tri 8 kg, as their brands give them.

What groupset do Scott Foil RC Tri and Sunn Gp Finest come with?

Scott Foil RC Tri: SRAM RED AXS, Force. Sunn Gp Finest: SRAM Force AXS E1.

How do Scott Foil RC Tri and Sunn Gp Finest compare on geometry?

In size M, Scott Foil RC Tri has a stack of 548 mm for a reach of 389 mm; in size M, Sunn Gp Finest has 544 mm for 384 mm. More stack for the reach means a more upright position.

Compare other models