Scott Foil RC Team vs Scott Foil RC Tri

Scott

Foil RC Team

Scott

Foil RC Tri

Top of the rangeAeroCarbon700c2026

Two builds of the Scott Foil line: 10 differences, mostly in the components.

ScottScott Foil RC Team

ScottScott Foil RC Tri

At a glance

Differences only

Scott Foil RC Team is 500 g lighter than Scott Foil RC Tri (brand figures).
Scott Foil RC Tri has the higher-range groupset: SRAM RED AXS, Force, against SRAM Force, Force eTap.
Scott Foil RC Team has the shorter lowest gear: 11 km/h at 90 rpm, against 12 km/h.

Key specs5 differences

Model year 2026 2026

Weight 7.5 kg ^{°Value not published by the brand} 8 kg ^{°Value not published by the brand}+500 g

Frame Carbon

As printed

Material: Carbon

Carbon

As printed

Material: Carbon

Wheelset 700c · Syncros Capital 1.0S Aero 60mm; 24 Front ^{°Value not published by the brand} 700c · 404 S — ZIPP 404 S Carbon Tubeless ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Drivetrain 2×12 2×12

Groupset SRAM Force, Force eTap ^{°Value not published by the brand} SRAM RED AXS, Force ^{°Value not published by the brand}Higher range

Brake model SRAM FORCE AXS HRD Shift-Brake System ^{°Value not published by the brand} SRAM eTap AXS Wireless Blips ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Seatpost Syncros Duncan SL Aero CFT Syncros Duncan SL Aero TRI

Prices

Each model's retailers, delivered to your country, and their prices over time.

Scott Foil RC Team

Scott Foil RC Tri

Affiliate links: no extra cost for you ♥

Character

The bike at a glance: the ground it is made for, how it handles, its gears and its equipment, beside the other bikes of its kind.

Foil RC Team · Road bike all-round, very stable, average gearing, very high equipment.
Foil RC Tri · Road bike all-round, very stable, average gearing, very high equipment.

Terrain

EasyDemanding

Handling

NimbleStable

Gearing

Speed in the lowest and the highest gear at 90 rpm: lower on the left climbs easier, higher on the right goes faster.

Scott Foil RC Team11 km/h - 55 km/h
Scott Foil RC Tri12 km/h - 55 km/h

Easiest gear (climbing)Hardest gear (descending)

Scott Foil RC TeamScott Foil RC Triother aero road bikes

Components and specs

Every spec line by line; the higher range of a component is marked. The technical groups are folded.

Ride type

Ride type Aero ^{°Value not published by the brand} Aero ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Frame and fork

Fork Carbon ^{°Value not published by the brand} Carbon ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Bottom bracket SRAM DUB PF ROAD 86.5 ^{°Value not published by the brand} SRAM DUB PF ROAD 86.5 ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Cable routing Internal ^{°Value not published by the brand}

As printed

Replaceable Derailleur Hanger; Internal cable routing

Internal ^{°Value not published by the brand}

As printed

internal cable routing

Drivetrain4 differences

Groupset brand SRAM ^{°Value not published by the brand} SRAM ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Shifting Electronic, wireless ^{°Value not published by the brand}

As printed

SRAM FORCE AXS; 24 Speed Electronic Shift System SRAM FORCE AXS HRD Shift-Brake System

Electronic, wireless ^{°Value not published by the brand}

As printed

SRAM FORCE AXS 24-Speed, Electronic Shift System SRAM eTap AXS Wireless Blips

Chainrings 2 ^{°Value not published by the brand} 2 ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Gears at the back 12 ^{°Value not published by the brand} 12 ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Chainring teeth SRAM FORCE Spindle Power Meter Crankset; 48/35 ^{°Value not published by the brand} SRAM FORCE Powermeter 48-35T ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Cassette SRAM FORCE XG1270; 10-36 ^{°Value not published by the brand} SRAM FORCE XG1270, 10-33T ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Rear derailleur SRAM FORCE AXS; 24 Speed Electronic Shift System ^{°Value not published by the brand} SRAM FORCE AXS 24-Speed, Electronic Shift System ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Shifters SRAM FORCE AXS HRD Shift-Brake System ^{°Value not published by the brand} SRAM eTap AXS Wireless Blips ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Power meter fitted yes ^{°Value not published by the brand} yes ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Brakes

Brakes Hydraulic disc ^{°Value not published by the brand}

As printed

SRAM Force Disque hydraulique

Hydraulic disc ^{°Value not published by the brand}

As printed

SRAM Disque hydraulique

Front rotor– 160 mm ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Rear rotor– 140 mm ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Wheels and tyres

Wheel size 700c / 29" ^{°Value not published by the brand} 700c / 29" ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Rims Carbon ^{°Value not published by the brand} Carbon ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Tubeless ready– yes ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Tyres Schwalbe PRO ONE Aero, TL-Easy, Fold, 700x28C ^{°Value not published by the brand} Schwalbe PRO ONE Aero, TL-Easy, Fold, 700x28C ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Tyre width fitted 28 mm ^{°Value not published by the brand} 28 mm ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Cockpit and seatpost2 differences

Handlebar Syncros Creston iC SL Aero ^{°Value not published by the brand} ZIPP VUKA Bull, VUKA clip with carbon EVO extensions ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Stem– Syncros Foil 1.5 Aero ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Seatpost model Syncros Duncan SL Aero CFT ^{°Value not published by the brand} Syncros Duncan SL Aero TRI ^{°Value not published by the brand}

° Value not published by the brand

Geometry

A size per bike (the nearest to the first one's at first), the differences measured from the reference bike.

Size of Foil RC Team

Size of Foil RC Tri

Differences measured from

Foil RC Team · M
Foil RC Tri · M

Stack and reach

Foil RC Team · M Foil RC Team · M — Reach (mm) 389 · Stack (mm) 548
Foil RC Tri · M Foil RC Tri · M — Reach (mm) 389 · Stack (mm) 548

Geometry

Size M M

Reach 389 mm 389 mm

Stack 548 mm 548 mm

Top tube (effective) 550 mm 550 mm

Seat tube 523 mm 523 mm

Head tube 141 mm 141 mm

Head angle 72.5° 72.5°

Seat angle 73.6° 73.6°

Chainstays 412 mm 412 mm

Wheelbase 993 mm 993 mm

Front centre 591 mm 591 mm

Standover 801 mm 801 mm

BB drop 70 mm 70 mm

BB height 275 mm 275 mm

Fork offset 45 mm 45 mm

Trail 59 mm 59 mm

Stem 110 mm 110 mm

Where to buy them

Scott Foil RC Team
Its full spec sheet Compare the whole Scott Foil range
Scott Foil RC Tri
Its full spec sheet Compare the whole Scott Foil range

Compare the whole Scott Foil range

Frequently asked questions

Which is lighter, Scott Foil RC Team or Scott Foil RC Tri?

Scott Foil RC Team weighs 7.5 kg, Scott Foil RC Tri 8 kg, as their brands give them.

What groupset do Scott Foil RC Team and Scott Foil RC Tri come with?

Scott Foil RC Team: SRAM Force, Force eTap. Scott Foil RC Tri: SRAM RED AXS, Force.

How do Scott Foil RC Team and Scott Foil RC Tri compare on geometry?

In size M, Scott Foil RC Team has a stack of 548 mm for a reach of 389 mm; in size M, Scott Foil RC Tri has 548 mm for 389 mm. More stack for the reach means a more upright position.

Compare other models

Scott Foil RC Team vs Scott Foil RC Tri

At a glance

Prices

Character

Gearing

Components and specs

Geometry

Stack and reach

Where to buy them

Frequently asked questions

Other comparisons