Scott Addict RC Team vs Scott Foil RC Tri

Scott

Addict RC Team

Scott

Foil RC Tri

Top of the rangeCarbon700c2026

Top of the rangeAeroCarbon700c2026

Close on the specs and the list price: here are their 12 differences, line by line.

ScottScott Addict RC Team

ScottScott Foil RC Tri

At a glance

Differences only

Scott Addict RC Team is 1 kg lighter than Scott Foil RC Tri (brand figures).
Scott Addict RC Team has the shorter lowest gear: 11 km/h at 90 rpm, against 12 km/h.

Key specs5 differences

Model year 2026 2026

Weight 7 kg ^{°Value not published by the brand} 8 kg ^{°Value not published by the brand}+1 kg

Frame Carbon ^{°Value not published by the brand} Carbon

As printed

Material: Carbon

Wheelset 700c · Zipp 303 SW TL Carbon ^{°Value not published by the brand} 700c · 404 S — ZIPP 404 S Carbon Tubeless ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Drivetrain 2×12 2×12

Groupset SRAM FORCE AXS SRAM RED AXS, Force ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Brake model SRAM FORCE AXS HRD Shift-Brake System ^{°Value not published by the brand} SRAM eTap AXS Wireless Blips ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Seatpost Syncros SP-R101-CF Syncros Duncan SL Aero TRI

Prices

Each model's retailers, delivered to your country, and their prices over time.

Scott Addict RC Team

Scott Foil RC Tri

Affiliate links: no extra cost for you ♥

Character

The bike at a glance: the ground it is made for, how it handles, its gears and its equipment, beside the other bikes of its kind.

Addict RC Team · Road bike rather demanding, rather nimble, average gearing, very high equipment.
Foil RC Tri · Road bike all-round, very stable, average gearing, very high equipment.

Terrain

EasyDemanding

Handling

NimbleStable

Gearing

Speed in the lowest and the highest gear at 90 rpm: lower on the left climbs easier, higher on the right goes faster.

Scott Addict RC Team11 km/h - 56 km/h
Scott Foil RC Tri12 km/h - 55 km/h

Easiest gear (climbing)Hardest gear (descending)

Scott Addict RC TeamScott Foil RC Triother road bikes

Components and specs

Every spec line by line; the higher range of a component is marked. The technical groups are folded.

Ride type

Ride type– Aero ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Frame and fork

Fork Carbon ^{°Value not published by the brand} Carbon ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Bottom bracket SRAM DUB PF ROAD 86.5 ^{°Value not published by the brand} SRAM DUB PF ROAD 86.5 ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Cable routing Internal ^{°Value not published by the brand}

As printed

Replaceable Derailleur Hanger; Internal cable routing

Internal ^{°Value not published by the brand}

As printed

internal cable routing

Drivetrain4 differences

Groupset brand SRAM ^{°Value not published by the brand} SRAM ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Shifting Electronic, wireless ^{°Value not published by the brand}

As printed

SRAM FORCE AXS; 24 Speed Electronic Shift System SRAM FORCE AXS HRD Shift-Brake System Electronic Shift System

Electronic, wireless ^{°Value not published by the brand}

As printed

SRAM FORCE AXS 24-Speed, Electronic Shift System SRAM eTap AXS Wireless Blips

Chainrings 2 ^{°Value not published by the brand} 2 ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Gears at the back 12 ^{°Value not published by the brand} 12 ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Chainring teeth SRAM FORCE Spindle Power Meter Crankset; 48/35 ^{°Value not published by the brand} SRAM FORCE Powermeter 48-35T ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Cassette SRAM FORCE XG1270 E1; 10-36 ^{°Value not published by the brand} SRAM FORCE XG1270, 10-33T ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Rear derailleur SRAM FORCE AXS; 24 Speed Electronic Shift System ^{°Value not published by the brand} SRAM FORCE AXS 24-Speed, Electronic Shift System ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Shifters SRAM FORCE AXS HRD Shift-Brake System Electronic Shift System ^{°Value not published by the brand} SRAM eTap AXS Wireless Blips ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Power meter fitted yes ^{°Value not published by the brand} yes ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Brakes

Brakes Hydraulic disc ^{°Value not published by the brand}

As printed

SRAM Force Disque hydraulique

Hydraulic disc ^{°Value not published by the brand}

As printed

SRAM Disque hydraulique

Front rotor 160 mm 160 mm ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Rear rotor 140 mm 140 mm ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Wheels and tyres2 differences

Wheel size 700c / 29" ^{°Value not published by the brand} 700c / 29" ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Rims Carbon ^{°Value not published by the brand} Carbon ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Tubeless ready– yes ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Tyres Schwalbe ONE TLE Race-Guard Fold, 700x30C ^{°Value not published by the brand} Schwalbe PRO ONE Aero, TL-Easy, Fold, 700x28C ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Tyre width fitted 30 mm ^{°Value not published by the brand} 28 mm ^{°Value not published by the brand}−2 mm

Cockpit and seatpost2 differences

Handlebar Syncros IC-R100-SL; Carbon combo ^{°Value not published by the brand} ZIPP VUKA Bull, VUKA clip with carbon EVO extensions ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Stem– Syncros Foil 1.5 Aero ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Seatpost model Syncros SP-R101-CF ^{°Value not published by the brand} Syncros Duncan SL Aero TRI ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Weight

Max total weight 120 kg –

° Value not published by the brand

Geometry

A size per bike (the nearest to the first one's at first), the differences measured from the reference bike.

Size of Addict RC Team

Size of Foil RC Tri

Differences measured from

Addict RC Team · M
Foil RC Tri · M

Stack and reach

Addict RC Team · M Addict RC Team · M — Reach (mm) 395.2 · Stack (mm) 543.3
Foil RC Tri · M Foil RC Tri · M — Reach (mm) 389 · Stack (mm) 548

Geometry14 differences

Size M M

Reach 395 mm 389 mm −6 mm

Stack 543 mm 548 mm +5 mm

Top tube (effective) 555 mm 550 mm −5 mm

Seat tube 482 mm 523 mm +41 mm

Head tube 130 mm 141 mm +11 mm

Head angle 72.8° 72.5° −0.3°

Seat angle 73.6° 73.6°

Chainstays 410 mm 412 mm +2 mm

Wheelbase 991 mm 993 mm +2 mm

Front centre 592 mm 591 mm −1 mm

Standover 778 mm 801 mm +23 mm

BB drop 72 mm 70 mm −2 mm

BB height 273 mm 275 mm +2 mm

Fork offset 44 mm 45 mm +1 mm

Trail 58 mm 59 mm +1 mm

Stem 110 mm 110 mm

Handlebar width 400 mm –

Crank length 170 mm –

Where to buy them

Scott Addict RC Team
Its full spec sheet Compare the whole Scott Addict range
Scott Foil RC Tri
Its full spec sheet Compare the whole Scott Foil range

Compare the whole Scott Addict range Compare the whole Scott Foil range

Frequently asked questions

Which is lighter, Scott Addict RC Team or Scott Foil RC Tri?

Scott Addict RC Team weighs 7 kg, Scott Foil RC Tri 8 kg, as their brands give them.

What groupset do Scott Addict RC Team and Scott Foil RC Tri come with?

Scott Addict RC Team: SRAM FORCE AXS. Scott Foil RC Tri: SRAM RED AXS, Force.

How do Scott Addict RC Team and Scott Foil RC Tri compare on geometry?

In size M, Scott Addict RC Team has a stack of 543 mm for a reach of 395 mm; in size M, Scott Foil RC Tri has 548 mm for 389 mm. More stack for the reach means a more upright position.

Compare other models

Scott Addict RC Team vs Scott Foil RC Tri

At a glance

Prices

Character

Gearing

Components and specs

Geometry

Stack and reach

Where to buy them

Frequently asked questions

Other comparisons