Runometry Index
72/100
Provisional index · 80 % read
Train
Stability
No. 10 of 34
Value for money: Very good
- Cushioning32.5 mm
- +33.8 pts
- Lightness270 g
- +27.1 pts
- Foam
- 11.0 pts
Which one for which runner?
What sets each model apart, from the published specs. Neither is better in absolute terms.
ASICS GT-2000 14
- 4.5 mm less under the heel
HOKA Arahi 9
- 4.5 mm more under the heel
Runometry Index
Same profile: their indexes compare directly.
ASICS GT-2000 14
HOKA Arahi 9
Runometry Index
75/100
- Cushioning37 mm
- +45.0 pts
- Lightness284 g
- +21.8 pts
- FoamEVA
- +8.0 pts
Side by side
- HOKA Arahi 9 has 4.5 mm more heel stack
Runometry Index
Runometry Index 72/100 75/100
Scored among same for allStabilityStability
Price
Catalogue price USD 140 EUR 160
Best price found Not specifiedNot specified
Specifications
Weight 270 g 284 g
Drop
Heel stack
Forefoot stack
Midsole foam FF BLAST MAX / PureGEL dual-density compression molded EVA
Plate None Not specified
Support same for allStabilityStability
Best for
Terrain same for allRoadRoad
Role same for allTrainingTraining
Versions same for allMen's and women'sMen's and women's
Uses same for allDaily trainingDaily training
Retailer prices
ASICS GT-2000 14
HOKA Arahi 9
Affiliate links: no extra cost for you ♥
Alternatives to these two models
Derived from terrain, category, use, cushioning, stability, drop, weight and price.
- Close to HOKA Arahi 9: same terrain, same category, same role
- Close to HOKA Arahi 9: same terrain, same category, same role
ASICS
GT-2000 13
- Weight 275 g
- Drop 8 mm
- Close to HOKA Arahi 9: same terrain, same category, same role
- Close to ASICS GT-2000 14: same terrain, same category, same role