Runometry Index
76/100
Train
Stability
No. 8 of 31
Value for money: Excellent
- Cushioning32.5 mm
- +42.2 pts
- Lightness270 g
- +33.9 pts
- Foam
Which one for which runner?
What sets each model apart, from the published specs. Neither is better in absolute terms.
ASICS GT-2000 14
- 3.3 mm less under the heel
HOKA Arahi 8
- 3.3 mm more under the heel
Runometry Index
Same profile: their indexes compare directly.
ASICS GT-2000 14
HOKA Arahi 8
Runometry Index
75/100
Train
Stability
No. 8 of 31
Value for money: Very good
- Cushioning35.8 mm
- +42.0 pts
- Lightness276 g
- +24.8 pts
- FoamEVA
- +8.0 pts
Side by side
- HOKA Arahi 8 has 3.3 mm more heel stack
CriterionASICS GT-2000 14HOKA Arahi 8
Runometry Index
Runometry Index 76/100 75/100
Scored among Stability same for all
Price
Catalogue price USD 140 USD 150
Best price found Not specifiedNot specified
Specifications
Weight 270 g 276 g
Drop
Heel stack
Forefoot stack
Midsole foam FF BLAST MAX / PureGEL dual-density CMEVA
Best for
Terrain Road same for all
Role Training same for all
Versions Men's and women's same for all
Uses Daily training same for all
Retailer prices
ASICS GT-2000 14
HOKA Arahi 8
Alternatives to these two models
Derived from terrain, category, use, cushioning, stability, drop, weight and price.
HOKA
Arahi 9
- Weight 284 g
- Drop 8 mm
- 6 colours
- Close to ASICS GT-2000 14: same terrain, same category, same role
ASICS
GT-2000 13
- Weight 275 g
- Drop 8 mm
- Close to HOKA Arahi 8: same terrain, same category, same role
ASICS
GT-1000 13
- Weight 275 g
- Drop 8 mm
- Close to HOKA Arahi 8: same terrain, same category, same role
Saucony
Echelon 11
- Drop 8 mm
- Close to HOKA Arahi 8: same terrain, same category, same role