1,272 running shoes listed and more than 1K prices compared every day (GB).

Skip to content

Saucony Hurricane 26 Black

Runometry Index 89 out of 100 · Train · StabilityRoadTrainingStabilityReleased 2026
Saucony Hurricane 26, side view, Black
Black

Shoe profile

Runometry Index

89/100

No. 1 of 31 among the current models of its profile

Value for money: Very good

Cushioning38 mm
+45.0 pts
Lightness262 g
+30.1 pts
FoamTPU
+14.0 pts

Measurements

Compared with the current models of its profile

Weight
262 g
Reference size not stated by the source
Very lightLighter than 93% of them
Drop
6 mm
LowLower than 77% of them
Heel stack
41 mm
Very highHigher than 87% of them
High stack shoes (≥ 40 mm)
Forefoot stack
35 mm
Very highHigher than 93% of them

Construction

Midsole foam
incrediLUX
Foam material
TPU
Outsole
XT-900

Who and what for

Use
Daily training
Versions
Unisex

Sources: saucony.com (manufacturer), saucony.com (manufacturer), slrc.com (retailer)

What’s new since the Saucony Hurricane 25

Same line, new version: here’s what moved, from the published values. Weights are only compared in the same size.

Read the full comparison
CriterionHurricane 26 (2026)This versionHurricane 25 (2025)Change
Weight 262 g 285 g Sizes differ or aren’t stated: no gap given
Drop 6 mm 6 mm Unchanged
Heel stack 41 mm 38 mm +3 mm
Forefoot stack 35 mm 32 mm +3 mm
Midsole foam incrediLUX PWRRUN PB / PWRRUN New
Catalogue price USD 170 USD 170 Unchanged
Runometry Index 89/100 81/100 +8 pts

Model history

2026 This version

2025

2024

2021

Similar shoes

Derived from terrain, category, use, cushioning, stability, drop, weight and price. Gaps are given against Saucony Hurricane 26.

    • same terrain · same category · same role

    • same terrain · same category · same role
    • 2 mm higher drop
    • 3 mm less under the heel

    • same terrain · same category · same role
    • 2 mm lower drop
    • 9 mm less under the heel

    • same terrain · same category · same role
    • 2 mm higher drop
    • 3 mm less under the heel

Report an error