Runometry Index
91/100
No. 2 of 87
Value for money: Excellent
- Cushioning37.5 mm
- +55.0 pts
- Lightness245 g
- +36.0 pts
- Foam
Shoe profile
Measurements
- Weight
- 245 g
- Reference size not stated by the source
- Very lightLighter than 81% of them
- Drop
- 6 mm
- LowLower than 63% of them
- Forefoot stack
- 34.5 mm
- Very highHigher than 96% of them
Construction
- Midsole foam
- MIZUNO ENERZY NXT
- Outsole
- X10
Who and what for
- Category
- Daily trainers
- Versions
- Unisex
What’s new since the Mizuno Neo Zen
Same line, new version: here’s what moved, from the published values. Weights are only compared in the same size.
| Criterion | Neo Zen 2 (2026)This version | Neo Zen (2024) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weight | 245 g | 235 g | Sizes differ or aren’t stated: no gap given |
| Drop | 6 mm | 6 mm | Unchanged |
| Heel stack | 40.5 mm | 40 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Forefoot stack | 34.5 mm | 34 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Midsole foam | MIZUNO ENERZY NXT | MIZUNO ENERZY NXT | Unchanged |
| Catalogue price | USD 160 | USD 150 | +USD 10 |
| Runometry Index | 91/100 | 94/100 | −3 pts |
Model history
Similar shoes
Derived from terrain, category, use, cushioning, stability, drop, weight and price. Gaps are given against Mizuno Neo Zen 2.
Mizuno
Esperunzer 2
- Weight 240 g
- same terrain · same category · same role
- 9.5 mm less under the heel
- Weight 244 g
- Drop 10 mm
- same terrain · same category · same role
- 4 mm higher drop
- 7.5 mm less under the heel
adidas
Supernova Comfortglide
- Weight 235 g
- Drop 10 mm
- 2 colours
- same terrain · same category · same role
- 4 mm higher drop
- 3.5 mm less under the heel
- same terrain · same category · same role
- 7 mm less under the heel