Runometry Index
No index yet
The brand does not say whether it has a plate: without it, we cannot find its real rivals.
How the index worksWhich one for which runner?
What sets each model apart, from the published specs. Neither is better in absolute terms.
Mizuno Neo Vista 3
- Latest version (2026)
- 5.5 mm more under the heel
Mizuno Neo Vista 2
- Previous version (2025)
- 5.5 mm less under the heel
Runometry Index
Each shoe is scored against the shoes of its own profile, from published facts only.
Mizuno Neo Vista 3
Mizuno Neo Vista 2
Runometry Index
61/100
Complete index
Go fast in training
Plated
No. 17 of 22
Value for money: Below average
- Lightness265 g
- +18.5 pts
- Cushioning40.5 mm
- +30.2 pts
- FoamEVA
- +12.0 pts
Side by side
- Mizuno Neo Vista 3 has 5.5 mm more heel stack
Runometry Index
Runometry Index Not specified 61/100
Scored among Not specified Plated
Price
Catalogue price same for allUSD 200USD 200
Best price found Not specifiedNot specified
Specifications
Weight 272 g 265 g
Drop
Heel stack
Forefoot stack
Midsole foam same for allMIZUNO ENERZY NXTMIZUNO ENERZY NXT
Plate Not specified Nylon
Support same for allNeutralNeutral
Best for
Terrain same for allRoadRoad
Role same for allTraining & racingTraining & racing
Versions same for allMen's and women'sMen's and women's
Uses same for allLong runsLong runs
Retailer prices
Mizuno Neo Vista 3
Mizuno Neo Vista 2
Affiliate links: no extra cost for you ♥
Alternatives to these two models
Derived from terrain, category, use, cushioning, stability, drop, weight and price.
- Weight 265 g
- Drop 6 mm
- Close to Mizuno Neo Vista 2: same terrain, same category, same role
- Weight 274 g
- Drop 6 mm
- Close to Mizuno Neo Vista 3: same terrain, same category, same role
- Weight 205 g
- Drop 6 mm
- Close to Mizuno Neo Vista 3: same terrain, same category, same role
Saucony
Endorphin Trainer
- Weight 280 g
- Drop 8 mm
- Close to Mizuno Neo Vista 2: same terrain, same category, same role