Runometry Index
No index yet
The brand does not say which trails it is made for (technical, versatile or ultra): we wait before ranking it.
Which one for which runner?
What sets each model apart, from the published specs. Neither is better in absolute terms.
Mizuno Neo Accera
- 6 mm more under the heel
Saucony Ride TR2
- 6 mm less under the heel
- USD 55 cheaper at catalogue price
Runometry Index
Each shoe is scored against the shoes of its own profile, from published facts only.
Mizuno Neo Accera
Saucony Ride TR2
Runometry Index
64/100
Run off road
Versatile trail
No. 16 of 53
Value for money: Very good
- Lightness296 g
- +24.6 pts
- Cushioning31 mm
- +25.4 pts
- FoamTPU
- +14.0 pts
Side by side
- Mizuno Neo Accera has 6 mm more heel stack
- Saucony Ride TR2 is USD 55 cheaper (MSRP)
CriterionMizuno Neo AcceraSaucony Ride TR2
Runometry Index
Runometry Index Not specified 64/100
Scored among Not specified Versatile trail
Price
Catalogue price USD 200 USD 145
Best price found Not specifiedNot specified
Specifications
Weight 290 g 296 g
Drop
Heel stack
Forefoot stack
Midsole foam MIZUNO ENERZY NXT PWRRUN+
Plate None Not specified
Best for
Terrain Trail same for all
Role Training same for all
Versions Unisex Not specified
Uses Trail running same for all
Retailer prices
Mizuno Neo Accera
Saucony Ride TR2
Alternatives to these two models
Derived from terrain, category, use, cushioning, stability, drop, weight and price.
- Weight 287 g
- Drop 8 mm
- Close to Mizuno Neo Accera: same terrain, same category, same role
Saucony
Ride TR2 GTX
- Weight 296 g
- Drop 8 mm
- Close to Mizuno Neo Accera: same terrain, same category, same role
- Weight 303 g
- Drop 8 mm
- 3 colours
- Close to Saucony Ride TR2: same terrain, same category, same role
adidas
Terrex Agravic Flow2
- Drop 8 mm
- Close to Mizuno Neo Accera: same terrain, same category, same role