Bmc Urs Two vs BH Rx Team 3.0

Bmc

Urs Two

Rx Team 3.0

Mid-rangeCarbon700c2027

Mid-rangeCarbon700c2026

Close on the specs and the list price: here are their 16 differences, line by line.

BmcBmc Urs Two

BHBH Rx Team 3.0

At a glance

Differences only

Bmc Urs Two is the newer model (2027).

Key specs6 differences

Model year 2027 2026

Weight 10.1 kg ^{°Value not published by the brand}–

Frame Carbon ^{°Value not published by the brand} Carbon ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Wheelset 700c · GR650 ^{°Value not published by the brand} 700c · Shimano RS171 ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Drivetrain 1×12 2×11

Groupset SHIMANO GRX 800, GRX 600 ^{°Value not published by the brand} Shimano 105, GRX 600 ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Brake model SHIMANO GRX (BR-RX410) ^{°Value not published by the brand} Shimano 105 ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Seatpost Rigid · URS ^{°Value not published by the brand} Rigid · BH RX ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Prices

Each model's retailers, delivered to your country, and their prices over time.

Bmc Urs Two

BH Rx Team 3.0

Affiliate links: no extra cost for you ♥

Character

The bike at a glance: the ground it is made for, how it handles, its gears and its equipment, beside the other bikes of its kind.

Urs Two · Gravel bike very demanding, rather stable, average equipment.
Rx Team 3.0 · Gravel bike made for very smooth ground, rather stable, average equipment.

Terrain

EasyDemanding

Handling

NimbleStable

Bmc Urs TwoBH Rx Team 3.0other gravel bikes

Components and specs

Every spec line by line; the higher range of a component is marked. The technical groups are folded.

Ride type

Suspension Rigid ^{°Value not published by the brand} Rigid ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Frame and fork1 difference

Fork Carbon ^{°Value not published by the brand} Carbon ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Max tyre clearance 47 mm ^{°Value not published by the brand} 45 mm −2 mm

Axles Thru-axles ^{°Value not published by the brand}

As printed

–

Bottom bracket SHIMANO Press-Fit Bottom Bracket (BB-RS500-PB) ^{°Value not published by the brand}–

Drivetrain6 differences

Groupset brand Shimano ^{°Value not published by the brand} Shimano ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Shifting Mechanical ^{°Value not published by the brand}

As printed

SHIMANO GRX (RD-RX822) SHIMANO GRX (BL-RX610 / ST-RX610)

Mechanical ^{°Value not published by the brand}

As printed

Shimano 105 Shimano 105

Chainrings 1 ^{°Value not published by the brand} 2 ^{°Value not published by the brand}+1

Gears at the back 12 ^{°Value not published by the brand} 11 ^{°Value not published by the brand}−1

Chainring teeth SHIMANO GRX (FC-RX610-1) ^{°Value not published by the brand} Shimano GRX 610 46/34 ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Cassette SHIMANO Deore (CS-M6100-12) ^{°Value not published by the brand} Shimano 105 11/34 ^{°Value not published by the brand}Higher range

Rear derailleur SHIMANO GRX (RD-RX822) ^{°Value not published by the brand} Shimano 105 ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Shifters SHIMANO GRX (BL-RX610 / ST-RX610) ^{°Value not published by the brand} Shimano 105 ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Brakes

Brakes Hydraulic disc ^{°Value not published by the brand}

As printed

Shimano GRX 400 Disque hydraulique

Hydraulic disc ^{°Value not published by the brand}

As printed

Shimano 105 Disque hydraulique

Wheels and tyres1 difference

Wheel size 700c / 29" ^{°Value not published by the brand} 700c / 29" ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Rims Aluminium ^{°Value not published by the brand} Aluminium ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Tubeless ready yes ^{°Value not published by the brand}–

Tyres Continental Terra Adventure Trail Grip ^{°Value not published by the brand} Michelin Mud2 700 x33 ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Tyre width fitted– 33 mm ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Cockpit and seatpost3 differences

Handlebar BMC HB D4 03, 0, 16 ^{°Value not published by the brand} BH Lite Compact ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Stem BMC RSM 01 ^{°Value not published by the brand} BH SL ^{°Value not published by the brand}

Seatpost model URS ^{°Value not published by the brand} BH RX ^{°Value not published by the brand}

° Value not published by the brand

Geometry

A size per bike (the nearest to the first one's at first), the differences measured from the reference bike.

Size of Urs Two

Size of Rx Team 3.0

Differences measured from

Urs Two · M
Rx Team 3.0 · XL

Stack and reach

Urs Two · M Urs Two · M — Reach (mm) 410 · Stack (mm) 580
Rx Team 3.0 · XL Rx Team 3.0 · XL — Reach (mm) 398 · Stack (mm) 598

Geometry14 differences

Size M XL

Reach 410 mm 398 mm −12 mm

Stack 580 mm 598 mm +18 mm

Top tube (effective) 571 mm 587 mm +16 mm

Seat tube 475 mm 560 mm +85 mm

Head tube 140 mm 180 mm +40 mm

Head angle 69.5° 71° +1.5°

Seat angle 74.5° 72.5° −2°

Chainstays 430 mm 426 mm −4 mm

Wheelbase 1,070 mm 1,038 mm −32 mm

Front centre 651 mm 626 mm −25 mm

Standover 758 mm –

BB drop 76 mm 71 mm −5 mm

BB height 273 mm 273 mm

Fork offset 45 mm 36 mm −9 mm

Trail 86 mm 80 mm −6 mm

Stem 70 mm –

Handlebar width 410 mm –

Crank length 170 mm –

Where to buy them

Bmc Urs Two
Its full spec sheet Compare the whole Bmc Urs range
BH Rx Team 3.0
Its full spec sheet Compare the whole BH Rx range

Compare the whole Bmc Urs range Compare the whole BH Rx range

Frequently asked questions

What groupset do Bmc Urs Two and BH Rx Team 3.0 come with?

Bmc Urs Two: SHIMANO GRX 800, GRX 600. BH Rx Team 3.0: Shimano 105, GRX 600.

How do Bmc Urs Two and BH Rx Team 3.0 compare on geometry?

In size M, Bmc Urs Two has a stack of 580 mm for a reach of 410 mm; in size XL, BH Rx Team 3.0 has 598 mm for 398 mm. More stack for the reach means a more upright position.

Compare other models

Bmc Urs Two vs BH Rx Team 3.0

At a glance

Prices

Character

Components and specs

Geometry

Stack and reach

Where to buy them

Frequently asked questions

Other comparisons